so i'm talking to downum, and he was reading my law of attraction post. i guess i should title this one cost of a women. this is basically a follow up, stemmed from the conversation at the end of this post. basically, if you look at this from a purely sexual viewpoint, as downum most certainly does, you calculate all the money and time you spend on your woman, versus how many times you sleep with her. that would be your average cost of sex per time. if a hooker is cheaper, it makes sense. if a hooker is more expensive, at least you get variety. per nathan, then again, rosy palm is always cheap and available. and she knows what i like. maximum efficiency on time spent and enjoyment gained.
[(AMT $$ SPENT) + (VALUE TIME LOST)] / # OF TIMES HUMPED = AVG COST OF HUMPAGE
IF AVG COST HUMPAGE < AVG COST OF HOOKER, GET HOOKER.
IF AVG COST HUMPAGE = AVG COST OF HOOKER, STRANGE > SAME, GET HOOKER
----------------------------
justin: "greedy materialistic prostitute" Classic!!!!
me: the stuff i am ashamed of isnt in there
haha
seriously
buy a chicks drinks, dinner, maybe get laid
same as a hooker
justin: no doubt!
me: look at the time + money investment in any gf, and the ratio to times sexxed
determine your avg cost of sex
see if a hooker is cheaper
and bam
wow
i have to write this in my blog
justin: hookers are by far a better investment!!!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment